Many skeptics will say
that most of the details about Jesus' life, particularly his miracles and resurrection, were added on later due to legend or
crafted to make a viable religion out of their dead Messiah. But, ask
yourselves, who was this new religion crafted for? Assuming for the moment that
the resurrection was made up, the new Christians' message of a resurrected Jesus would not have appealed to Greeks or
Romans. To them, our body was a cage, and the goal was for our souls to
"fly away" (sound familiar - even some hymns have non-Christian
influences...). No Greek or Roman would want a resurrection. For them, the body
is crude and vulgar, and the soul craves freedom.
So, who's left? The Jews.
Yet the idea of a crucified Messiah was appalling to the Jews. Their Messiah
was a victorious ruler, not a dead-dog of a man hanging on a cross.
What, then, is the point
of this new religion that focuses on a man come back to life? Why craft a new religion that makes no sense to or
offends all of your potential converts? Oh, and preaching this new thing you
just made up will get you beaten or killed by these people you've just upset. If you're going to make up a narrative about your Messiah, why that one?
No Jew would have made up a crucified Messiah, and no Greek or Roman would have wanted a resurrected one.
Thus the best explanation for the birth of Christianity, rather than being an invention, is that this
dead-dog Jesus actually got up again a few days later and appeared to his
followers. Imagine the shock of seeing your Rabbi walking toward you a couple of days
after you just saw him killed. That's the sort of thing the one doesn't forget.
The rise of Christianity
must be explained in a way that makes sense of the historical realities.
No comments:
Post a Comment