We're All Atheists Now?

When you atheists understand why a jury can convict one particular person for a crime and not any of the other 7+ billion people on the planet who are technically eligible suspects, then you will understand why I am a Christian believer. The available evidence points to the Christian God, not to Zeus, Thor, or Quetzalcoatl.

If one were to live by the logic presented in this uncompelling meme, our judicial system would collapse. A lawyer for a likely murder suspect could simply say to the jury, "Surely you would agree that all these other people in this courtroom are innocent of this crime. I'm simply asking that you go one suspect further and declare my client innocent of these charges."

We are confident in the Christian God because that is where the evidence points regardless of the other options.

[This response is adapted from the work of Andy Bannister in Chapter 3 of The Atheist Who Didn't Exist.]

Science and Observations of God

What is the message of this meme?

• Science improves our knowledge over time. We have better images now of things that were previously inaccessible to us.
• Science couldn't then nor can it now observe God.
• Therefore, God must not be real because science cannot see him.

How to respond?

1. Science is a wonderful enterprise that does indeed improve our knowledge, and Christians should embrace, rather than fear, it.
2. The traditional Christian conception of God is that he is not physical, so we should not expect to be able to physically see him.
3. This world is full of things that skeptics, atheists, and scientists in general have good reason to believe exist even though they cannot see them, such as magnetic fields, quarks, a mathematical point or line, past genetic mutations, past transitional forms for which there are no fossils, force carriers in physics like photons or gluons, and past historical events for which there are no records.
4. The epistemology (or way of knowing) of this meme and of the average skeptic is weak sauce. If we limited our knowledge to only that which we could see, then we would know very few things indeed.

If atheists and skeptics want to claim that they can be confident in their lack of belief in God because science hasn't observed him, then to be consistent they must also claim to lack a belief in many other things that are not controversial.

Do You Apologist Well?

I know that this is shocking, but some people are not followers of Jesus. (Insert sad emoji here)

In our neighborhoods and around the world, there are people who haven't heard about Christ or who are actively rejecting him. We have a responsibility, given to us by the Lord, to share our Christian convictions with these folks and to try to bring them to the faith.

So, what happens when you do this and the person you are speaking with asks you a question, or challenges your view?

Do you answer it?

If you do (or try to), then in that moment you are an apologist for the Christian faith. You are attempting to remove an obstacle that is in the way of this person coming to Christ.

The important question is: will you do this well? or will you do it poorly? Will you help this unbeliever think about Christianity in a better way or will you add to their confusion?

The heart of apologetics beats for these moments. It is a branch of theology that exists to help Christians share their convictions thoughtfully, meaningfully, and with relevance. Apologetics will give you the tools to get better at these conversations so that we can have confidence in sharing Jesus.

I suppose we could ignore their questions or challenges and just keep on talking to them as if they hadn't said anything. We could treat them as one evangelistic contact among many and write them off as too stubborn to follow Jesus.

Or we could treat them as a human being made in God's image who simply has an honest question or is repeating a challenge that they heard somewhere.

What if your thoughtful response was what made the difference in that person's journey to Christ?

On Standing for Truth in the Public High School

I am a public high school physics teacher. I am also committed to following Christ and to the idea that his reign extends to all of life. Yet in our culture it is inappropriate for a public educator to proselytize or to advocate for one's own religion. How then do I stand for Christ while not being able freely to discuss him in the classroom?

Consider this conversation between me and a student:

Student: Where is room 235?

Teacher: Where would you like it to be?

Student: [look of confusion] I don't know...

Teacher: Well, culture tells us that we can make up our own truth. What true for you is not true for me. So, what is the truth here?

Student: Well, I guess whatever makes us happy?

Teacher: Great. So where would you like room 235 to be to make you happy?

Student: I just want to get to my meeting!

Teacher: Oh, so room 235 can't be just anywhere?

Student: I guess not.

Teacher: So, truth isn't just what we make it to be?

Student: Nooo...[again, the look of confusioin]

Teacher: Room 235 is just around the corner.

What was my point of this conversation that the student probably thought was pretty weird? It was simply to show that reality does not bend to our wishes, that the things that we think in our heads must match the world out there if they are to be true.

Nobody can possibly live consistently with the idea that truth is what we make it, no matter how many times we are told otherwise. Room 235 is where it is and not where I'd like it to be.

Before a person can accept the truth about Jesus Christ and his work of redemption for mankind, and person must first believe that the Christian account of reality is true. Before they can accept the Christian understanding of the world as true, they must first believe that truth is true. Francis Schaeffer used to talk about the notion of "pre-evangelism," that is, that before we can meaningfully discuss the gospel with someone, we first have to prepare the soil, so to speak. They have to be ready to hear truth, and if they are not ready, then we will not be communicating what they first need to hear.

So I look for opportunities in the classroom to show my students that truth is true. The world does not stoop to me; I must stoop to the world. In lots of little ways like this I am proclaiming truth to my students. Then, maybe down the road in God's sovereignty somebody else will come along to meaningfully share the gospel of Jesus Christ and that person will be ready to hear and consider it.

Something to think about.

A Sword & Shield

This blog is dedicated to thinking carefully and learning more about our Christian convictions.  When we develop our minds to the glory of God, we become more complete disciples (Matthew 22:37).  By encouraging our ability to think and learn, we are served in at least two ways.  First, we grow the tools that we need to defend our convictions when they are questioned.  We need not feel threatened when the attacks come.  Good responses are out there, and we can do the work of discovering what they are.  This process of learning provides us with a shield to protect us from offensive arguments from our culture. 

Secondly, by developing our minds we also learn confidence that we know the truth, that what we believe corresponds to reality.  This confidence, then, allows us to take what we know out into our culture in the same way that a sword was used as an offensive weapon in ancient battles.

Don't go out into battle unarmed. Train your mind to enter into service of our Lord.

So a sword and shield. Offense and defense. Useful to "demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God (2 Corinthians 10:5, NIV)."